{# load django_bootstrap5#%}
   CCDB is a community resource. If you are aware of any missing data or if any of the counts are erroneous please submit it to the forms submit new counts, or report erroneous counts.
CCDB → Angiosperms → Compositae → Brachyscome → Brachyscome multifida DC.
Name | Accepted Name | Gametophytic(n) | Sporophytic(2n) | Data Source | reference | ||
! | Brachyscome multifida var. multifida | Brachyscome multifida DC. | 7, 14(1, 1) | 14, 28(1, 1) | Asteracea | Smith-White et al. 1970 Aust. J. Bot. | |
Brachyscome multifida DC. | Brachyscome multifida DC. | 7II, 9II(3, 2) | 14, 18(1, 1) | Asteracea | Watanabe et al. 1996 Muelleria | ||
Brachyscome multifida DC. | Brachyscome multifida DC. | 9II | 18 | IPCN online | Watanabe, K. & P. S. Short. 1992. Chromosome number determination in Brachyscome Cass. (Asteraceae: Asteraeae) with comments on species delimitation, relationships and cytogeography. Muelleria 7: 457–471. | ||
Brachyscome multifida DC. | Brachyscome multifida DC. | 7II, 9II | 14, 18 | IPCN online | Watanabe, K., P. S. Short, T. Denda, Y. Suzuki, M. Ito, T. Yahara & K. Kosuge. 1996. Chromosome number determinations in the Australian Astereae (Asteraceae). Muelleria 9: 197–228. | ||
Brachyscome multifida DC. | Brachyscome multifida DC. | 9II | IPCN online | Carr, G. D., R. M. King, A. M. Powell & H. Robinson. 1999. Chromosome numbers in Compositae. XVIII. Amer. J. Bot. 86(7): 1003–1013. | |||
! | Brachyscome multifida DC. | Brachyscome multifida DC. | 18 | IPCN online | Watanabe, K., T. Yahara, T. Denda & K. Kosuge. 1999. Chromosomal evolution in the genus Brachyscome (Asteraceae, Astereae): statistical tests regarding correlation between changes in karyotype and habit using phylogenetic information. J. Pl. Res. 112: 145–161. | ||
! | Brachyscome multifida DC. | Brachyscome multifida DC. | 14 | IPCN online | Watanabe, K., T. Yahara, T. Denda & K. Kosuge. 1999. Chromosomal evolution in the genus Brachyscome (Asteraceae, Astereae): statistical tests regarding correlation between changes in karyotype and habit using phylogenetic information. J. Pl. Res. 112: 145–161. |